About the review

Title: Module Sixteen
Listen online: 
 
 download add to playlist
Artist: roncli
Genre: Classical/New Age: New Age
Reviewed by: Randor on July 28, 2007 (All reviews by Randor)

Review Feedback: 
roncli gave Randor negative feedback for this review.

Agree		 
Disagree

Review

 Agree with this review?  
Have an opinion and want to be known for it? Share your opinion directly with the musican and start earning your Reviewer Reputation by reviewing this song.


1Overall Description
Personally I like all the musical content track offers, apart genre suggestion I hear some pop flavours on melodies melted among medieval string riffs. Good combination makes me hesitate with scores, I'm between 3 and 4 here. There's no doubt of my pleasure but how it reflects with todays music?? As a past tracker I'm not bothered tracked quality even it must be counted. If anything, this track would deserve a complete renewation with todays tools. Generous composition is what I adore here.
 
2Arrangement Description
As a tracked piece this sounds almost mono, stereoimaging is quite poor but rest of the arrangement is just glorious. Smooth tempo accelerations, refreshing transitions...list goes on. Said about generous composition, it goes to arrangement too. Highlight for me is in a minute stone, track builds up with an impromptu sounding riff bursts giving real goosepumps to me!! Fantastic movement!!!
 
3Sound Quality Description
As a tracked oldie quality isnt really outstanding. This doesnt bother much, only in mid of track where drums, strings and bass plays I really miss larger bottom sound. When guitar enters it stands out even more clear: fat sound is crucial in such places. More dynamics is needed.
 
Comments
Aug 13 2007 5:36 pm
by TwiTerror
Haha, oh my. I say review the mp3, but whatever. I thought it was tracked when I reviewed it, honestly (;



Jul 30 2007 12:36 pm
by roncli replying to Randor
My apologies then. Still, I'm glad you liked this, but re-read your review, and it's clear you were thinking this was done in a tracker. Or do people consider Reason a tracker these days? ;)



Jul 30 2007 12:24 pm
by roncli replying to slammy
You're on CRAQ. If someone's going to be reviewing music, they review the MP3. No comment needs to tell them that, they should just do it. For the record, the IT file is much larger, although it's a moot point at the moment.



Jul 29 2007 3:46 am
by Randor replying to roncli
I reviewed mp3, didnt assume its tracked cause I can hear it. Despite quality issues song has outstanding composition, strongly recommended :)



Jul 28 2007 7:09 pm
by slammy
Gonna play devil's advocate here :D. Cause I can!. One should have mentioned in the song comments, that this is infact a remake of the source file!!!!. Can't blame Randor for grabbing a smaller file ;)



Jul 28 2007 6:27 pm
by roncli
One should review the MP3, not the source, and DEFINITELY not the IT source, as that's not the song uploaded. It is simply provided for comparison for the remake.